Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> writes:
> What's the point of usbmgr? Modules get loaded automatically.
Where do you get this information from? I admit to not being
extremely knowledgeable about 2.6, but it seems to fly in the face of
reason that the kernel would automagically recognise all device-types,
classes, etc.
Try hot-plugging a new device without usbmgr, hotplug, or a similar
daemon running. And by new, I mean one that was created after your
current kernel version. If it uses a different combination from
FWIW, the incorrect USB driver is loaded by default on my laptop. I
have to manually specify the correct driver. Which leads me to
believe that this autoloading hasn't been fully debugged.
> Also, is it "2.6-safe"? After all, it uses /proc/bus/usb.
Again, I'm not familiar with 2.6 enough to know what you mean by
this. Could you give a reference?
The changelog for usbmgr contains the following note:
- added for new modutils which is used on Kernel 2.5 and later.
So I imagine it is.
Mark.
-- Peace is only better than war if peace isn't hell, too. -- Walker Percy, "The Second Coming" ___________________ Nolug mailing list nolug@nolug.orgReceived on 02/27/04
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 12/19/08 EST