RE: [Nolug] help with long email threads

From: John Souvestre <johns_at_sstar.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 19:36:05 -0600
Message-ID: <00e701c40640$0e242560$8600000a@JohnS>

Hi Ron.

Yes, people read top to bottom, that's why top posting makes sense. The
post is what they want to read. The rest is just there for reference. Most
of the time there's no need to read it.

John

    John Souvestre - Southern Star - (504) 888-3348 - www.sstar.com

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nolug@joeykelly.net [mailto:owner-nolug@joeykelly.net] On Behalf
Of Ron Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 4:32 PM
To: NOLUG ML
Subject: RE: [Nolug] help with long email threads

On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 16:28, Pietu wrote:
> > Top-posting (what you're suggesting) is evil.
>
> Amen!
>
> And I still can't see what is evil in top, side, inline, bottom posting.
> I'll do them all depending on the situation and i have no remorse or
> problems with sleeping. :)

TP is Evil because people read top-to-bottom, not bottom-to-top.

Bottom- and Inline- posting, with judicious use of snip, is The
One True Way, and anyone who doesn't should be banished to Outlook
Hell.

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ron Johnson, Jr. ron.l.johnson@cox.net
Jefferson, LA USA
"I went home with a waitress the way I always do. How was I to
know she was with the Russians, too?"
___________________
Nolug mailing list
nolug@nolug.org
___________________
Nolug mailing list
nolug@nolug.org
Received on 03/09/04

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 12/19/08 EST