Re: [Nolug] redirecting console?

In answer to the first question: its a 486 configured with firewall and
masquerading. In answer to the second: yea, that's what I thought. I
didn't know if there was some way to have some basic networking loaded
early on, or some other kind of magic just so the console signal got
sent over the ether instead of to the video controler. Then a running
machine could capture it. I think I knew it was far fetched, but I had
to ask ;-)

On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 06:37, Dave Prentice wrote:
> In order for its output to go to another machine via network, the
> network has to be up and running. I doubt if you can redirect the boot
> process to another machine because networking comes near the end,
> However, once it's running you can just telnet or ssh into it to see
> what's going on.
> Dave Prentice
> prentice@instruction.com
> http://www.originsresource.org
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher M. Jones <cjones@partialflow.com>
> To: nolug@joeykelly.net <nolug@joeykelly.net>
> Date: Monday, September 06, 2004 12:19 PM
> Subject: [Nolug] redirecting console?
>
>
> >I recently set up a router at home. I don't have a monitor connected
> to
> >it, and I wondered if there is any way to have the router's console
> >redirected to one of my Linux workstations so I can monitor bootup
> and,
> >once the system is up, monitor console messages. Possible? How?
> >
> >___________________
> >Nolug mailing list
> >nolug@nolug.org
>
> ___________________
> Nolug mailing list
> nolug@nolug.org

___________________
Nolug mailing list
nolug@nolug.org
Received on 09/07/04