Well, the conversation started with an Ubuntu vs. Debian slant, so I
assumed desktop because of the Ubuntu mention. Sure, you can use it
for a server, but frankly I haven't really seen it mentioned as being
used for anything but a desktop Linux. (Although Ubuntu's marketing
literature would beg to differ.)
That said, Ubuntu could be the greatest Linux server distro in the
world, but I wouldn't know since I haven't tried it. ;-)
--- Puryear Information Technology, LLC Baton Rouge, LA * 225-706-8414 http://www.puryear-it.com Author: "Best Practices for Managing Linux and UNIX Servers" "Spam Fighting and Email Security in the 21st Century" Download your free copies: http://www.puryear-it.com/publications.htm Thursday, December 7, 2006, 1:44:44 AM, you wrote: > On 12/6/06, Dustin Puryear <dustin@puryear-it.com> wrote: >> >> Debian does have a rather painfully slow release cycle. > I actually find that a plus in a world where I maintain many dozens of > systems. I would rather patch a system to current patches on a three year > old release than have a release no longer officicially maintained after 12 > months (fedora). Desktops aside, slow release cycles are not a bad thing. > Another reason I love my Sun Solaris systems... years and years and years of > patches & official support. ___________________ Nolug mailing list nolug@nolug.orgReceived on 12/07/06
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 12/19/08 EST