On 08/05/08 14:06, Dustin Puryear wrote:
> I don't understand what you mean by: 'Because the driver of cost is the
> number of "complete computers"?' What do you mean "complete computer"?
> You mean with a keyboard and monitor?
"Complete" as in "has a hard drive, and boots locally, so each PC
needs to be individually updated".
> "Required" as in "the company needed to support software which they
> needed to sell what they were selling so they could make a profit and
> pay people".. required. :)
Or... "new additional" as in, they just purchased new software which
only runs on Windows.
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>> On 08/05/08 13:35, Dustin Puryear wrote:
>>> Hardware was a factor, but not a big factor. It was more about
>>> management. Once you have more than a few machines the man-hours
>>> required to manage systems quickly becomes the most expensive element
>>> of IT. Specific to Windows, we saw that quite clearly as our support
>>> costs didn't rise very far at all even thought we were replacing
>>> green tubes with Windows TS servers and thin clients at several
>>> locations.
>>
>> Because the driver of cost is the number of "complete computers"?
>>
>>> In the end, I think we put around 100 or so thin clients in place and
>>> hired.. nobody. Yet we could offer the required functionality to our
>>
>> "Required" as in "new additional"?
-- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA Scientists are people, too. IOW, they also "crave power, money, respect, and influence, and they also fear for their jobs. Each can be a healthy motivator, but each has the ability to turn a good scientist into a bad one; and in some cases, they can turn a good scientist into a charlatan." http://thefutureofthings.com/book/3/the-bomb-that-never-was.html ___________________ Nolug mailing list nolug@nolug.orgReceived on 08/05/08
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 12/19/08 EST