Re: [Nolug] Using RH9 as a router and nat firewall

From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson_at_cox.net>
Date: 12 Jul 2003 01:55:39 -0500
Message-Id: <1057992939.17227.2.camel@haggis>

On Fri, 2003-07-11 at 23:03, Tim Kelley wrote:
> On Friday 11 July 2003 5:40 pm, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2003-07-11 at 16:34, Tim Kelley wrote:
>
> > If someone cracks your machine, he has access to all of your
> > files.
>
> Well, regardless, if you're running a public server, whether it is a
> firewall or behind one, there's no real difference. If you weren't
> running anything publicly accessible there would be a point.
>
> For example, i am running smtp, dns, http, https, pop3s; all accessible
> to the public. In my little case it makes just as much sense to run my
> firewall on my "server". If someone were to break into my network
> somehow it would be the same.

Yes, because port forwarding would not give any security boost.

However, a workstation with someone's personal files on it is
a different thing.

-- 
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| Ron Johnson, Jr.     Home: ron.l.johnson@cox.net          |
| Jefferson, LA  USA   http://members.cox.net/ron.l.johnson |
|                                                           |
| 4 degrees from Vladimir Putin
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
___________________
Nolug mailing list
nolug@nolug.org
Received on 07/12/03

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 12/19/08 EST