Agreed, and that's not the reason for this post.
He's not exactly running his platform based on this, its simply a small
part that caught my eye,
he seems to have the most outspoken position out of all the candidates,
and there are plenty of things where
I can easily go along with what he's saying because I don't know much
about some of the topics.
He's got just as much written in his platform regarding the environment,
health care,
rebuilding the job market, etc. I don't agree with him on everything.
In fact he seems almost too
tech-centric for me (taking the state gov't completely paperless is also
on his platform)
but to be honest, i wish all the candidates were this informative on
their intentions/opinions.
Most others seem to have a lot of stock answers/rhetoric, and nothing
nearly this transparent
I'm mostly posting to see who out there likes/dislikes this guy and why,
its hard for me to find
much info on him that isn't on his website.
Brett D. Estrade wrote:
>My first reaction is that this is something that any smart leader would
>look at anyway - unfortunately the field is thin on smarts. IMHO,
>running on a platform of using OSS would be almost as effective as
>Leach's attempt to get into office by riding this state minimum wage
>initiative and wanting to increasing tax on oil/gas.
>
>As much as I agree with what software to use and how to facilitate a more
>efficient administrative system for the state, I can't say that this
>alone is the basis for my decision for selecting a candidate.
>
>Brett
>
>
___________________
Nolug mailing list
nolug@nolug.org
Received on 09/30/03
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : 12/19/08 EST