Re: [Nolug] Glogs and galleries

    It all depends on what you mean by "conservative" and "liberal."
If you mean fiscal, almost all from both parties are tax-and-spend
types. (Or in the case of the Pres, don't-tax-but-still-spend.) If you
mean on abortion, the Dems have firmly committed themselves in favor,
while it seems taht most Repubs are against. Environment, gay
marriage, immigration, etc. are each separate issues.
    I don't think there are very many people who would fit the
stereotype of conservative on every issue, nor are there many 100%
liberals. You have to look at the person's position on the issues. (Of
course, with Sen. Kerry that depends on his audience. At least W is
consistent.)
Dave Prentice
prentice@instruction.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
To: NOLUG ML <nolug@joeykelly.net>
Date: Thursday, August 05, 2004 9:30 AM
Subject: Re: [Nolug] Glogs and galleries
On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 11:08 -0500, Tim Kelley wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 August 2004 08:09, Ron Johnson wrote:
[snip]
> > Any "conservative" national Democrats? (Except Zel Miller?)
> Plenty. Almost all of them. Clinton, for example, was very
conservative.
> Lieberman is practically a fascist. See "parameters of debate"
above.
>From your perspective, I can see that. Most of us, though, dis-
agree.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson, LA USA
PGP Key ID 8834C06B

"Why should we not accept all in favor of woman suffrage to our
platform and association even though they be rabid pro-slavery
Democrats."
Susan B. Anthony, _History_of_Woman_Suffrage_
http://www.ifeminists.com/introduction/essays/introduction.html

___________________
Nolug mailing list
nolug@nolug.org
Received on 08/05/04